“If You’re So Rich, Why Aren’t You So Smart?” – Nassim Nicholas Taleb I got interested in luck recently. Not the superstitious kind of luck, where you avoid opening an umbrella indoors over a black cat while throwing a pinch of salt under a ladder, but whether it is possible to change your experience of luck. As Nassim Nicholas Taleb says in “Fooled by Randomness” and as Robert H. Frank says in “Success And Luck”, most of what separates billionaires from the rest of us is luck.

When ChatGPT exploded onto the scene on November 30, 2022 (hard to believe that was less than 2 years ago!), the idea of AI “alignment” was suddenly a big deal. That means “alignment with human values.” I thought: “wouldn’t it be nice if humans were aligned with human values”? Even some values that seem uncontroversial, like “tell the truth,” are things that most people agree with but nobody actually does. Sorry, Jim-Bob, when your sister said “your new glasses are cool” what she actually meant was “your new glasses make you look like a dork”.

According to the Stack Overflow’s Workplace Satisfaction Survey, 80% of professional programmers are unhappy. But the problem isn’t AI, and it’s not coding. Many developers start off their day with a “stand-up” meeting, which is considered a standard part of an Agile development methodology. Unfortunately, many companies do a pale cargo-cultish shadow of a stand-up, which wastes everyone’s time and saps the energy out of the team. The problem with stand-ups as practiced by many companies is that people don’t actually know what the stand-up is for.

A few years ago, software engineering was a pretty great job market. Then, in 2022, tech companies laid off 165,269 employees. In 2023, they laid off another 264,220 employees. So far, in 2024, they’ve laid off 124,517 employees. It used to take very little time to find a new tech job, and now most of us have friends who have been looking for a new job for months, or even more than a year.

“Intelligence is knowing that Frankenstein is not the monster. Wisdom is knowing that Frankenstein is the monster.” “Eat rocks,” said Google’s AI, apparently confusing people with ostriches. Meanwhile, Apple decided the best way to sell iPads was to literally crush musical instruments. Welcome to the wacky world of AI marketing, where billion-dollar companies with genius-level employees somehow keep making decisions that would embarrass a sleep-deprived intern. These facepalm-inducing moments aren’t just amusing anecdotes; they’re symptoms of a larger problem in the tech industry: a critical lack of wisdom.

Let’s face it–the internet is a giant distraction engine. Ever gone online to check the weather and somehow ended up watching a whole documentary about monarch butterfly migration? It’s like going to the store for milk and coming home with a live chicken. The internet is designed to capture your attention and hold on to it like a puppy with a rope toy. And while that’s great for advertisers, it’s not so great for your own productivity or your precious and limited free time.

Once upon a time, a scorpion needed to cross a river. He couldn’t swim, so he asked a frog he found by the riverbank for a ride on his back. The frog was hesitant at first. “What if you sting me?” he asked. The scorpion reasoned, “If I sting you, we both would drown!” So, the frog agreed, thinking it made sense. Halfway across the river, the scorpion stung the frog.

In a classic 3-act story structure, there’s a turning point at the end of the second act called “All Hope Is Lost”. If world history was a story with us as characters, the All Hope Is Lost moment would be now. At least that’s what I was thinking when I watched a video from the Stockholm Impact Week where Daniel Schmachtenberger explains the Metacrisis. If our story is going to have a happy ending, the protagonist (that’s us) is going to have to do something difficult and heroic.

Yesterday, Sam Altman, the CEO of OpenAI, was suddenly fired by the board of directors, and Greg Brockman, co-founder and president, quit in solidarity. Ilya Sutskever, the company’s chief scientist and a member of its board, defended the decision in a company all-hands meeting. The only thing we know is that the company says Mr. Altman “was not consistently candid in his communications” with the board. Ilya Sutskever has a Ph.